Monday, August 15, 2016
School fires and dysfunctional learning approaches and philosophy
Saturday, July 9, 2016
power of personal reflection
Tuesday, May 10, 2016
why do students hate maths?
The lack of shortcut to solutions of maths problems may be a major discouragement to such students and lecturers. If say it is a linear system, it either have a unique solution, many solutions or no solution, but you have to prove beyond doubt that it is either of the three. This is unlike in some scenarios in the humanities or arts where a problem may have many solutions, depending on whoever is talking. A person may put forward a case and always assume to be right as per his own justification. Alternatively differing camps may arrive at a consensus even if the problem is still unsolved. This can be attested by the way politicians agree on certain political issues. The problem is never solved, but if they were to think mathematically or scientifically then there is a high likelihood that the problem wont reoccur. Unfortunately most of these politicians lack a strong mathematics (scientific) reasoning.
Hence a student will sit in a maths class so as to get the right grades and finish his degree and thereafter supposedly go out in the world and make money. That thinking is normally captured by newspaper articles on how a billionaire makes a lot of money and yet he dropped out of the education system. They wrongly assume that the only ultimate goal of school learning is the ability to make money. Hence if a learning experience is seen to be an obstacle to finalize my education journey to that goal, then it is not important. Maths is often a victim since you cannot break its laws and appreciating the working of these laws require patience. This thinking kills the essence and the beauty of learning and moreso learning maths: the logics in maths.
Some fundamental problems that afflict our society can easily be sorted out if people understand simple laws of (maths) nature. For example, water follows its course, it always find its own level. Even in traditional African societies we had sayings that echos this simple but complicated law. Most of our roads are in pathetic condition simply because the 'engineers' did not really comprehend the implication of gravitational forces, laws governing fluid flows, vector laws among others while constructing roads. A murram road can withstand harsh wet conditions for a long time if it is engineered well. An engineer who can forego shortcuts and stick to the laid rules can leap big in the long run than the shortcuts of corruption. What joy will you get if you leave in luxury but not in peace since you fear your poor neighbour will mug you? Good well constructed and maintained earth/murram roads that are far cheaper than tarmac roads can change the lives of many poor people as they wait for tarmac roads.
These are laws that directly or indirectly can be captured by those who like maths, and by a keen facilitator of maths learning. A system that requires a unique solution has no shortcuts. For a system to be balance, it needs the right inputs/variables. To avoid conflict of whatever nature, all the systems must be in tandem with each other. Learning of whatever kind must be seen to add value to the learner. There is no learning that is useless, otherwise it is not learning. Such values should be capture very early in the cycle of learning. The mentality of waiting to 'use' knowledge after graduating, almost 16 - 20 years of education is disservice to oneself and humanity in general. It is paramount to teach history such that an individual can appreciate the impact of knowledge, skills and attitudes throughout man's history of growth and development. As a student, one should strive to diligently inquire the relevance of such knowledge and skills without bias in-spite of his weakness of the same. Anything that is, is important, the fact that you do not see its importance not withstanding.
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Individualized Education Programme IEP
Learning is not a hard science. There is no single formula that can be applied to all learners to achieve the desired learning outcome.Furthermore, each learner is unique and so is the facilitator of the learning process and as a consequence the learning process should be unique to an individual learner. That complicates the learning process in a school setup where the availability of qualified and passionate facilitators of learning are scarce, to allow a 1:1 ratio. Hence an individualized education programme will then be tailored made for the so called special cases only. Unfortunately this contradicts the assumption that we are all unique and we all need individualized education. In most cases we target the marginalized minority on the negative side i.e. those who have poor handwritings, get all sums wrong, the easily agitated, those who have many spelling errors etc. What about those who are excellent as per our standards? How do we ensure they exploit their potential to the fullest? What about the normal student? are they just normal or conformist, or have they mastered what the society want and follow what the society advocates to be the right standards? Despite the fact we all complain of a poor education system that cannot address the societal challenges, not forgetting we are part of the system.
Reflection on what kind of learners i have and what kind of teacher i am, can have great benefits. Analysing critical incidences in and out of our classrooms can help discover the uniqueness in each one of us. Of course reflection per se can be hard and bias. The assumption is, if you are highly exposed to the right knowledge, skills and attitudes, you can be in a better position to utilize these abilities - reflecting and CIA, to their fullest.
This post welcomes replies on what potential you discovered, what insights you had, when you reflected on your IEP and took whatever steps you undertook. Sharing of experiences can be beneficial to any reflective individual.